Worst. Spoiler. Ever.
May. 18th, 2008 | 09:38 pm
mood:
angry
"You'll have to read the book to find exactly what this enemy is, but I think I can tell you that this enemy likes to laugh, and not in a good way."
Wow, I really wish I hadn't seen it, it spoiled so much for me! I think I lost a lot on the suspense now that I know that this villain like to laugh, like, I don't know, almost every fucking third villain in literary history.
As you might have guessed from everything written above, I am no Inheritance fanboy. In fact, I have a strong dislike for Paolini and his whole franchise. I will give him some credit for having the drive to complete a whole book while still a teenager, but having watched the movie adapted from Eragon, I must say that it was so fucking much like the first Star Wars movie that it seemed illegal. I mean, Eragon has a farm boy of mysterious parentage who lives with his uncle, has his house burned by agents working for an evil empire, and is initiated by an old man into an ancient order of knights that was almost completely wiped out by someone who was once a knight himself but now works for the empire. Then, our farm boy and his elderly mentor help rescue a princess from imprisonment by the empire, and then they join a group of rebels who fight against the empire. If this doesn't remind you of the plot of A New Hope, than you must have never heard of Star Wars before.
Now, I wouldn't mind this sort of "medieval take on Star Wars" if it was posted on some fanfiction site, but now that Pao-Pao is making millions off this and has managed to get his book into bookstores all over the multiverse, I think he's definitely broken the law with his plagiarism and should have George Lucas sue his lazy ass off.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
At last, my latest deviation is complete!
May. 18th, 2008 | 12:07 am
mood:
accomplished
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
I has updated my scraps folder
May. 16th, 2008 | 11:19 pm
mood:
lazy
Do not fret, someday I am going to grow some balls and submit something of higher quality.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Most random political shirt of 2008?
May. 14th, 2008 | 05:35 pm
mood:
shocked
OK, so what does a banana-eating chimpanzee (who looks suspiciously like Curious George...LOL copyright violation!) have to do with Barack Obama? Is Obama supposed to be particularly soft towards chimps, or does he espouse the theory of evolution?
Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Conquistidors vs dinosaurs on the Sci Fi channel tomorrow
May. 9th, 2008 | 04:22 pm
mood:
sick
Tomorrow, the Sci Fi channel is going to show one of the most bizarre dinosaur movies I have ever heard of: Aztec Rex. Now, I have nothing against the concept of Aztecs and conquistidors fighting dinosaurs, but I still don't have high expectations for this movie; it's probably going to be yet another cheezy monster movie with lots of paleontological inaccuracies and pathetic CGI. Still, I intend to watch it as soon as possible, just for shits and giggles.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
It's time for...(drum roll)...trexmaster's top 12 favorite animals!
May. 8th, 2008 | 05:47 pm
mood:
bouncy
12. Wooly mammoth
I feel a perverse affection for big, fat things like whales, rhinos, hippos, and elephants. They make me want to hug them. Anyway, of all these animals, I chose the wooly mammoth, because they look just plain majestic, with curving tusks, thick dark brown to blond hair, and their prehensile trunks. I truly enjoy imagining a herd of these animals roaming the subarctic, snowswept tundra, scraping the snow away in search of grass, and fighting the Neanderthals, Native Americans, and saber-toothed cats that preyed on them.
11. Spotted hyena
Spotted hyenas are perhaps the most underrated and undeservedly maligned of all of Africa's main predators. Contrary to popular misconception, they are not moronic obligate scavengers, but are actually much more aggressive hunters than their overrated nemesis, the lion (which steals from hyenas no less than the reverse). Why have both Western and African cultures hated on them so much throughout history? My guess is that it's an old grudge inherited from the days when huge packs of hyenas chased our homininan ancestors across the savannah.
10. Nile Crocodile
I wasn't sure whether to select this or the Saltwater crocodile as the choice croc. In the end, I went out with the Nile, because even though the saltie is much larger, the Nile takes much larger game. Fully grown Nile crocs will take almost any large animal that stays too long at the waterhole---they've even been observed attacking lions and humans. Makes you wonder who the real king of the African beasts is...
9. Quetzalcoatlus
Although Quetzalcoatlus isn't nearly as popular as the pointy-crested Pteranodon, it is arguably even more spectacular, because it's arguably one of the most fucking humongous pterosaur ever unearthed (the only rival I know of is the earlier Ornithocheirus). I wonder what it would be like to ride one of these guys, to feel the wind pound against my shirt and gaze at the jungle from twenty feet above the canopy.
8. Gorilla
Partly it's because of the "big fat thing" mentioned earlier, but what makes me feel particularly fond for gorillas compared to other fat things is their similarity to humans. Not only are they highly sociable like us, but there's also evidence that they can communicate quite fluently in sign language and paint images without training. They are almost like people; pudgy, hairy, and foliovorous people.
(BTW, that gorilla doesn't really mean that gesture. According to the web page from whence I got it, she has a tendon issue that forces her middle finger to stick out like that. Despite its unfortunateness, it still looks really cute).
7. Ankylosaurus (from now on, it's going to be all dinosaurs)
Ankylosaurus and its kin were possibly the toughest herbivores ever to walk the Earth. Even tyrannosaurids would have reconsidered attacking this spiky behemoth that could lethally cripple with one knock from the mace attached to its tail.
6. Stegosaurus
This one's a tried-but-true classic. Like Ankylosaurus, Stegosaurus was an offshoot of the Thyreophora, the "shield-bearing" dinosaurs. I really like those nifty pentagon-shaped plates; I imagine that were brightly colored in life either to attract mates or to scare off theropods like Allosaurus.
5. Allosaurus
Speaking of Allosaurus, I'm giving him #5 on this list. Apex predator of the Jurassic plains, Allosaurus probably hunted everything from ornithopods to stegosaurs to even the mighty diplocids and brachiosaurids. Scientists think that its bite was like a hatchet; it threw down its skull and ripped off flesh from the sides of its victims. And check out those foreclaws!
4. Utahraptor
By far the largest known member of the dromeosaurid family, Utahraptor probably comes closest to the archetypical image of the raptor. Growing up to 6 feet tall and 20 feet long, Utahraptor was big enough in my opinion to not need the feathery covering that smaller dromeosaurids had (not absolutely against feathers on raptors, I just miss the scaly ones that were extremely popular during my childhood). Utahraptor most likely used its infamous hindclaws not to disembowel prey, as was formerly thought, but to stab and anchor into it while the beast tore at them with its jagged teeth and formidable foreclaws. Pity its name doesn't slide off the tongue as beautifully as Velociraptor, for it is my conviction that Utahraptor is way, way cooler and more fearsome.
3. Apatosaurus
It is a terrible shame that we can't call this guy "Brontosaurus" anymore. That name ("thunder lizard") was much more poetic and descriptive of this 30-ton diplocid than its current name, which means "deceptive lizard". Whatever you call it, Apatosaurus must have been a most awesome beast when it lived back in the Jurassic, with its gracile tail that could snap like a bullwhip. The sonic boom produced would have sounded almost like thunder!
2. Triceratops
Another classic dinosaur, Triceratops was the last and most massive of the ceratopsians. Contemporary of Tyrannosaurus rex, Triceratops would have been a formidable adversary for the giant coelurosaur. Evidence that the two titans really clashed includes Triceratops frill fragments encrusted in T. rex droppings, and T. rex toothmarks (some showing signs of healing) on Triceratops skulls. One peculiar characteristic of Triceratops is its frill; while most ceratopsians had a pair of large fenestrae (holes) in their frills, Triceratops's frill was solid, making it stronger and more effective at protecting the neck from carnivore attacks.
And now, we come to numero uno...
1. Tyrannosaurus rex
This one's been my favorite for almost my entire fucking life. Although T. rex is no longer considered the largest theropod, having lost that title to the piscivore Spinosaurus, it was still the deadliest. Faster and more powerful than any other predatory dinosaur longer than forty feet, T. rex could charge up to 18-25 mph and chomp at a force of 50,000 lbs, much more than any other land animal. T. rex was also equipped with forward-facing eyes that gave it stereoscopic vision and small but heavily muscled arms that it would have used as meathooks to hold onto its prey. Plus, it has the most beautiful name, which translates to "tyrant lizard king".
T. REX WILL ALWAYS BE THE KING OF BEASTS!
Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
What have I come down with?
May. 8th, 2008 | 05:37 pm
mood:
sick
I've heard that it's moving around school. Maybe I infected someone?
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Why does anyone give a fuck about Jeremiah Wright?
May. 7th, 2008 | 09:10 pm
mood:
irritated
I'm horribly sick of all this "Wright could hurt Obama's campaign" bullshit. So Obama's (obviously senile) pastor happens to have said some controversial things in one sermon. So fucking what? Obama himself has made it clear in a speech several weeks ago that he strongly disagreed with many of Wright's more batshit crazy assertions, so no one with a fully functioning brain should assume that this should reflect poorly on Obama. Besides, how fucking likely is it that a guy with a white mother is going to be the sort of black supremacist Wright is said to be? Just forget about Wright already!
Fucking Republican ad hominen smear tactics.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
In which I post a random selection of the hottest chicks in the multiverse
May. 3rd, 2008 | 08:46 pm
mood:
horny
Oluchi Onweagba (check out her page at Sports Illustrated):
Jessica White
Sung Hi Lee
Lee Hyori
Gabrielle Union
Beyonce Knowles
Nicole Scherzinger (the lead singer for the Pussycat Dolls; I highly recommend checking out their "Don't Cha" vid on Youtube)
Miwa Oshiro
That's all for the moment...but I'll be back!
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
A few games I would really like to get my hands on
May. 2nd, 2008 | 10:05 pm
mood:
nerdy
Turok 2008: I'm probably gonna need an new video card for this one (my current card, an nVidia 6600, though good enough to play most pre-2007 games with a decent fps, could barely manage Crysis, so I know I've got to up it soon), but who doesn't want to fight dinosaurs in the jungle? I must admit, though, that I don't really care for the decision to move the setting to an alien planet and make Turok an ordinary marine. I prefer the Lost Land of Turok: Evolution and its predecessors, with its syncretic mixture of prehistoric, futuristic, and fantasy (ancient ruins, castles, etc.) elements, and while I don't mind Turok using hi-tech fusion cannons, it was also fun to fight with Neolithic arrows and war clubs.
Spore: Even though it most likely will consume an ungodly fuckload of hard disk space, I am allured by the idea of creating your own species of animal, guiding its evolution, and then making it sentient and forming tribes. I already have in mind what kind of race I want to design---it's probably going to be a reptilian, dinosaur-like race of carnivores, sort of like the Quintaglios in Robert Sawyer's Quintaglio Ascension trilogy (well, not exactly, I do have some imagination after all).
Civilization Revolution: Although the graphics as shown in the screenshots look a bit too cartoonish and the terrain too squarish, I would like to see what kind of new gameplay mechanics Sid has added here. The Civilization games seem to grow in depth with every installment.
Grand Theft Auto IV: If I had a decent console (my PS2's been busted for 2-3 years now). BTW, what is it with the dumbshits who whine about "violent video games" like GTA? It. Is. A. Fucking. Game. The victims of the violence are nothing more than a bunch of pixels whose sentience is limited to the instructions from the game's programming. It isn't real. Why do people continue to fail at distinguishing fantasy from reality? I bet 90% of the people who play these things would never shoot, run over, or mug real, breathing humans beings---and the remaining 10% have probably been horrifically fucked up in the head anyway.
Any of the God of War games: Given how popular these have been, and how commonly other games have ripped off them, it's weird that I have never shown any interest in them. I must have missed a really awesome experience.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
On religion in general
Apr. 30th, 2008 | 08:40 pm
mood:
contemplative
My answer is the last one. I see no more compelling reason to believe in gods than in ghosts, invisible purple Gastonia, the Matrix, or anything else baselessly speculated by humans. I think the whole notion of gods is nothing more than a concoction by humans to explain natural phenomena before we had scientifically examined them enough, or possessed the technology necessary for such examinations, to truly understand the processes behind them. Now that our scientific knowledge has deepened enough so that we know that gods aren't behind volcanic eruptions, precipitation, tides, or everything else we attributed to them, the god hypothesis has lost so much credibility that it now seems like a quaint relic---and yet, belief in gods persists among the public. I think there are at least three primary reasons for this. One, not everyone has the same level of understanding of science, so some are still tempted to invoke a god to explain what they don't know. Secondly, many have found it useful to appeal to the authority of a god to justify the rules and traditions that organize their society (hence stuff like the Ten Commandments). Thirdly, I think gods often function the adult equivalent of some children's imaginary friends; they offer consolation and someone with whom to talk when no one else will listen. That's why you have people saying they "talk to God" or "know Jesus".
But ah, the theist asks, if gods don't exist, how do you explain the origin of the Universe? What started the Big Bang? It couldn't have started by itself, could it? Theists say that everything has to have a cause, so that cause must be the gods. The problem with this reasoning is it leads to another question: if everything has to have a cause, then the gods themselves must have a cause, which in turn would have its own cause, etc. We could go on ad infinitum, so in the end, we're still left with the question of what began everything, including this neverending chain of causes that eventually led to the gods who created the Universe. "All right," the theist may say, "so the gods were uncaused, but the Universe needs a cause, so the gods must have made it." Well, the point where you draw the line between when something can be uncaused and when something needs a cause is clearly arbitrary. There is actually no good reason to think the Big Bang needed a cause any more than the gods alleged to have created it. That doesn't necessarily mean that gods didn't create the Universe, I just mean to show that it is fallacious to insist that they did on the grounds that everything needs to have a cause, as the theists do.
Now, since cosmology and astrophysics tend to fly over my head, I don't have any fucking idea what could have caused the Big Bang, but for the aforementioned reasons, I don't find the god argument any more convincing than simply stating that the Big Bang was uncaused. I think we should continue collecting the necessary data to form an informed hypothesis and maybe actually find the answer instead of invoking gods to fill in the gaps in our species' collective knowledge. The god conjecture has failed to explain so many natural processes in the past that it is doubtful that it will confirmed for this area.
One thing that confuses me about theists is that they strongly believe in the gods of their own religion, but disbelieve in the gods of other faiths. Why should Yahweh or Allah be any more real than Osiris, Ra, or Kukulcan? It is not as if they have left any more hard evidence of their existence than these other deities. It is also interesting to notice how religions grow and die over the ages even though the same gods are presumably watching over us during this time. Few people today believe in the same gods as those several millennia ago, who in turn worshipped different gods than their distant ancestors. With that in mind, I imagine that, many centuries in the future, Christianity, Islam, and other current major religions will be regarded as ancient mythology, and the religious will be bowing down to very different pantheons. Meanwhile, we atheists will continue to wait until human science has learned enough to come up with a more likely origin of the Universe and everything.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
On creationists
Apr. 30th, 2008 | 04:50 am
mood:
awake
Tyrannosaurus rex vs. Veggie Tales, courtesy of Stephen J. Greene. And yes, creationists actually think T. rexes and other non-avian theropods were herbivores. I ain't shitting you.
In case you haven't already heard, the creationists have recently shoved into theaters Ben Stein's infamous "documentary" Expelled. Among the documentary's major allegations is that 1) creationists* are victims of persecution by a conspiracy of "Darwinist" scientists and 2) Darwinism led to the Holocaust. Both claims are demonstrably false; the "creation scientists" claimed in the documentary to have been "expelled" for their views really weren't, and far from espousing Darwinian views on biology, the Nazis actually included books advocating Darwinian evolution on their "banned books" lists.
Expelled is the latest effort in the large and well-funded creationist movement's jihad against science. The creationists have established several large organizations (Answers in Genesis, Discovery Institute, etc.) and cranked out dozens of books, tracts, websites, TV shows, and even a few museums slinging mud not only at modern evolutionary biology, but also geology, chemistry, physics, and anything else that contradicts their religious beliefs. To be bluntly honest, I find these people quite fucking repulsive. They arrogantly reject tons of modern scientific evidence in favor of the mythology of some Bronze Age Arabian tribe, and they frequently resort to dishonest tactics (quote-mining, mischaracterization, outright lying, etc.) to propagate their bullshit. Their promotion of ignorance is not only obnoxious, it's dangerous to the education of the public.
That said, creationists can also be fucking hilarious. Their faith in obsolete, 3,000-year-old religious texts, their futile efforts to reconcile their dogma with modern science, their ignorance about science in general, and their stupidity just earn smirks from more informed individuals. If you want to observe for yourself just how bone-headed creationists frequently are, I recommend you start off with the excellent "Why do people laugh at creationists" series on Youtube.
One of the paradoxes of our species is that we can be both the most intelligent and the most abysmally stupid of all primates.
* No, I won't, and never will, refer to them as "intelligent design proponents", because let's face it, that amounts to nothing more than a politically correct euphemism.
Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Writer's Block: Back in Time
Apr. 29th, 2008 | 07:28 pm
mood:
calm
The Ice Age: Dinosaurs aren't the only prehistoric animals I like. It would also be awesome to see saber-toothed cats and wooly mammoths, not to mention meet Neanderthals.
Ancient Egypt: Mmm...hot black girls dressed in golden bling. Oh, and we would finally figure out how those pyramids were built. No more idiots running around attributing their construction to aliens or Atlanteans.
2006: To prevent this from happening. Steve Irwin's death was way too early, for there were still so many adventures he could go on. After rescuing him, of course, I would take him with me on my Mesozoic safari---because Steve Irwin vs dinosaurs has got to be seen.
